Even though he was the film’s main baddie, Vanko never rose above clichés as his personality was completely one-dimensional and boring.
#Micky rourke iron man 2 movie#
One of the problems with the movie was the underdeveloped character of Ivan Vanko, aka Whiplash, played by Mickey Rourke. Unfortunately, a flat script and an overcrowded supporting cast made Iron Man 2 look rusty in comparison to the brilliant original. So when Iron Man 2 came out in 2010, fans were basically foaming at the mouth in anticipation of Ol’ Shellhead’s second adventure. Iron Man 3, which it is safe to assume won't include the participation of Mickey Rourke, is scheduled to hit theaters May 3rd, 2013.When Iron Man was released in 2008, it was hailed as one of the most sophisticated and visually striking superhero movies to ever grace the big screen. The Immortals hits theaters this Friday, November 11th, 2011. Perhaps that’s because this is the first major villain Rourke has portrayed since Iron Man 2, and he still has a terrible taste in his mouth about the whole ordeal.Ĭheck out Roth Cornet's interview for more about how unhappy Mickey Rourke is with the Iron Man 2 end product.ĭo you agree with Mickey Rourke about Iron Man 2 and its lack of a strong or interesting villain? Let us know in the comments.
It’s interesting that Mickey Rourke is choosing now to bash Iron Man 2 (repeatedly, and to different outlets), when Marvel has since released two financially successful films and has its biggest – The Avengers – on the way (not to mention Iron Man 3, written and directed by Shane Black ( Kiss Kiss Bang Bang)). You get through the day and you look forward to going to work the next day, sometimes." So it's a collaborative, supportive kind of thing, instead of a laborious technical twelve hours. And he was so enthusiastic that it rubs off on the crew, it rubs off on the other actors. He had little things that were all 'Oh wow.' And that's what it's all about - to have somebody working with you that can kind of take your performance further than you maybe think you can or whatever. Otherwise, you end up with what happened on 'Iron Man.'"īy comparison, The Immortals' director, Tarsem Singh,was significantly more impressive. So, if you're working with some good studio guys that got brains and you're working with a director with a set of nuts that'll let you incorporate that then it's fun. Otherwise, if you're working for the wrong studio or let's say a director that doesn't have any balls, then they're just gonna want it to be the evil bad guy. You have to fight for that though, to bring layers to the character. "If they let you play the bad guy with other dimensions other than one-dimensional.
While speaking to MTV Splash Page, Rourke blamed both the studio – for their desire to make mindless comic book movies – and Jon Favreau – for his lack of conviction (or in Rourke’s words, his lack of “nuts”) - for Vanko's deficiencies: Because that can make somebody say at the end of the day, oh **** ‘em, I’m just going to mail it in. I don’t want to have to care so much and work so hard, and then fight them for intelligent reasoning, and just because they’re calling the shots they… You know, I didn’t work for three months on the accent and all the adjustments and go to Russia just so I could end up on the floor. If they want to make mindless comic book movies, then I don’t want to be a part of that.
0 kommentar(er)
